very bad cameras, average processors and graphics, they are of metal unibody but are rather thick and heavy, in most cases are overpriced and most of all none of 2011 models was innovative - none of them stood out at anything and there were always superior products in any price group.
They made decent brands but destroyed them with poor devices. Desire at its time was about as big as Galaxy, but they destroyed it with Desire S which wasn't even better than the original Desire. And that was when everyone anticipated new flagships from HTC, like Desire 2, which is what they should have released.
And they had a major opportunity to carry it on, especially with a lot of Android people being huge fans of HTC. They were in a much better position than Samsung which succeeded with great products despite far bigger opposition - after all a few years back they were one of the most disregarded mobile phone companies.
Also I don't think that Galaxy is an important brand. They could've released the Galaxy S2 and name it Samsung S2 and it probably wouldn't sell much less, just because it's a very capable and complete smartphone.
HTC would sell their tablets better if they were HTC Desire Flyer or something - just because their tablets were very poor.
I mean - I quite like HTC but I always thought that they were a bit overpriced - it was often kind of justified because they used to deliver quite capable smartphones when the competition didn't play serious yet and succeeded at creating a big brand. For some really strange reason with their rather high prices they made people believe that they are paying for premium devices of outstanding build qualtiy, which is very hard to achieve for a company, especially if it's not exactly true and you're Taiwanese.
But this year they failed by releasing a lot of poor products and having literally none seriously good while the competition moved on and came up with innovative and really cool and complete devices.