You missed the point. Even compared to humans 10.000 years ago, chimps are fucking barbarians. Perhaps chimps aren't a brilliant generic example to use in my point, it only becomes interesting if we're gonna have a socio-biological discussion in here. But all social animals, and more likely than not a whole bunch of solitary species, have some degree of instinctive morals. These are not "learned" morals, because the principle that we as humans have called "morals and ethics" is a fundamental trait that enables us to function in a group.
Man did not invent "morals", we just gave it a name and expanded on the idea.
I also won't deny that religion helps to imprint the basic set of morals (that enable our social functioning) into new members of humankind, it's one of the few good aspects about any religion (though I must admit I'm not up to date on the commandments of Thor. Maybe they say "bash your neighbour", I don't know).
What it comes down to is that the idea of morals and ethics is an innate thing. Religion did not create it and man wouldn't turn into degenerates if there was no religion. We'd be fine.
I wrote a whole Preach-rant but I can be much more to the point about the chimp-thing: what i was trying to compare was that chimps and humans function pretty much the same socially but that chimps lack the organized religion that we have. Looking back on it I worded it piss-poorly (as in, seemingly opposite of what I was trying to say). Apologies.
Man did not invent "morals", we just gave it a name and expanded on the idea.
I also won't deny that religion helps to imprint the basic set of morals (that enable our social functioning) into new members of humankind, it's one of the few good aspects about any religion (though I must admit I'm not up to date on the commandments of Thor. Maybe they say "bash your neighbour", I don't know).
What it comes down to is that the idea of morals and ethics is an innate thing. Religion did not create it and man wouldn't turn into degenerates if there was no religion. We'd be fine.
I wrote a whole Preach-rant but I can be much more to the point about the chimp-thing: what i was trying to compare was that chimps and humans function pretty much the same socially but that chimps lack the organized religion that we have. Looking back on it I worded it piss-poorly (as in, seemingly opposite of what I was trying to say). Apologies.
Now I get the point. lol