Yes, there should be some checks and balances on the implementation of technologies like cloning, for instance, but we don’t need religious authority for that. We need our own ethical sense and rational debate. A religious code of ethics based on personal reward for behaving morally or eternal punishment for not doing so leads to a flawed morality with long-term and serious consequences for humankind. Many of society’s ills result to a considerable degree from religious morality based on fear of the unknown. Behaving morally for no reward and in no fear of punishment, but because we have the capability of being moral creatures, is one of the traits that can define humanity.
In no way I mean that the Church is really needed and could not be replaced by any organization controlling ethics in this case.
Although the fear and reward for behaving morally wrong/right still seems to affect a lot of people who would behave wrong if they didn't get punished for it. Some people would restrain themselves from committing crimes not because they're scared of jail but because they're afraid of going to hell.
The fact that you and me have healthy moral systems doesn't mean that someone else does. Religions seem to still work for them and kick in where everything else has failed.
However - my only point I was trying to make in this thread is that religions were in fact supporting science and that it's not entirely bad in this case like some people seem to think.
So your (Jokerman's) first (or second if you count the "me and Duke are fools" one) paragraph is pretty much what I was trying to tell.
Just to make it clear - I don't go to Church and I justify builidng Churches just for the culture diversity sake and out of respect for other peoples' beliefs.
However I think some people see me as the prime Bible thumper on this board.
It's just that most religious guys on this boards seem to ignore these threads even if there are ridiculous statements involved. I understand that this place is dominated by atheists but whenever there's a sign of religion there are also extreme sentences and bashing.
Even while trying to clarify something I get shitted on. So anti-religius behavior is always good, no matter how extreme and with no merit just because it's anti religious. Whenever anyone comes up with anything that stands in defense of a religion, even if it's backed up with facts and is pretty obvious here it's idiotic.
Anything is being used to shit on religion. Even saying that it's not entirely black or white thing is wrong here because it's so obvious that there's nothing good about religions and all they do is evil :unsure:
The hate is unbelievable.