Google condemns Verizon for what? Starting the DROID line/moniker? I feel Android would be like Symbian if it weren't for any one carrier to endorse a line as much as Verizon endorsed Android in the US. Android would have been big in places that weren't as excited for the iPhone (pretty much where it was expensive and fewer could afford it) so basically everywhere but the US.
It was a catch-22 for Google, but push come to shove, Google better suck Verizon's dick.
It was a catch-22 for Google, but push come to shove, Google better suck Verizon's dick.
This for example:
http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/16/3513860/motorola-stock-android-customization-verizon
Sure Verizon helps Motorola sell with advertisement money, that's why they have the power. But because of this the only thing they get is that guys on the other side of the world get shitty Motorola phones instead of awesome stock Android, so they lose a lot of potential markets. And frankly, US is not the biggest market for Android so I believe that manufactures lose a lot by "partnering" with carriers in the US like that. Especially US-only carriers that only care about their US market.
I don't know Android's history in the US but it would surely take off without Verizon. In the US it was Droid, internationally it was Milestone. Just a different naming scheme, but they didn't really take off too well outside of US.
Android took off worldwide with G1, however, as far as I can tell it was T-mobile which is to thank for that, and T-mobile is an international brand as opposed to Verizon.
For example in Europe, Android only had to compete against Symbian and Windows Mobile at the time of its launch and it had it easy with T-mobile promoting the G1.