LoL, thats ok Sofi, I don't expect you to
I try, every day, but it's hard when you live in a materialistic world such as ours. Primarily we all operate from the ego first, then spirit second. IMO.
Conspiracy theories, by their very definition, cannot be proven or disproven in the strict scientific sense.
So you only believe in proven "science" Duke, is that what you are saying ?
You are utterly convinced about Illuminati and whatever. You have no proof for this. But I don't have any proof that they DON'T exist either. So it doesn't matter what I say or do, you will remain staunchly convinced that it's true what you read on tinfoilhat.org or YouTube. .
Am I ? Who the fuck are you to tell me what I'm utterly convinced with or in ? You don't have any proof of secret societies Duke ? Go look up a freemason membership or lodge in your hometown, almost guaranteed you will find one. FYI members of the illuminati are all 33rd degree Freemasons, don't know what I'm on about? Look it the fuck up, and do some research.
For every common-sense argument that is brought to the table, the conspiracy theorist has some "way-out".
"Those conspiracy sources are shaky at best"
Way out: Well, that's because they don't have the resources the Illuminati have! .
I'm sorry, duke, who are you quoting here ? Some imaginary person, in order to try and discredit me ? Hmm, sorry not working...... just making yourself look more of a fool. Is that possible? We'll see......
"It's impossible to keep a huge conspiracy like 9/11 under the table"
Way out: You underestimate the evil of our government! .
Ummm, again, who you quoting ? Sorry not working, again.
"This is the Information Age, there's no way anymore to keep really big things under the lid"
Way out: But don't you see, they control the media! .
Ummm, again, who you quoting ? Sorry not working, yet again.
Etc etc etc. It's useless. It's like arguing with religious people, or debating with some asshole that thinks his cat is a powerful alien.
The argumentative flaw is more eloquently worded by the good people at Cracked.com: .
Well one thing I will happily agree with you is that talking to religous fanatics, is like talking to a brick wall.
And, sorry, I'm not familiar with that website. Only tinfoilhat.org.....tis where I get all my info from, fool.
Apart from the Hannah Montana joke, this accurately exposes the flawed argumentation of most conspiracists. .
Does it ? Ohh, ok the Dukey Boy, I will take your stereotypical, predjudiced word for it.
What's even worse is that you create a thread and claim it's meant as an open conversation. You say you want people to dime in with their opinion. People do so.
When an opinion correlates with your own, you laud them and say thanks. When an opinion disagrees with yours, you turn hostile and insulting. .
Yeah, I did create a thread, in the hope that you (same) assholes wouldn't be the same old fuckwits you were on my other threads, how fucking wrong was I, so fuck you, it's on, again. I did try to be nice about it and wanted this to be a sweet as conversation only thread. But you just make it so damnnnn hard.
Isn't that funny? It's so typical. You don't want debate. You don't want to hear both sides to the story. You only want to proclaim your own version of the truth and you immediately shit on everyone that doesn't agree.
In the couple of threads and posts in which you were active with subject matter that was open for discussion, you've displayed this behaviour over and over again. You think you have a monopoly on the truth. .
Duke, you got me all wrong, after your replies, I am all for debating now, so bring it.
You can come off as the cool headed, level headed bullshit artist that you are, but you don't fool me, and that's why I have zero tolerance for you and your crew from now on.
I will try not to be nasty about it, but I have no patience or tolerance for you anymore so that will be a task on it's own.
In fact, some of us including myself, have made semi-friendly attempts to bring some nuance in the debate by saying "of course there are influential groups, but not to the extent that you and others claim".
But are we treated to a insightful and balanced reply? .
You don't deserve a balanced reply, do I reply to everyone like I do you and Masta that "doesnt corellate" with me, well?...Answer the question if only that one !?
No, we are given a demeaning and insulting answer, often implicating that we're dumb, mindcontrolled sheeple.
And then you act totally aggrieved that people in turn reply to you in a tone that tells you to suck it.
Damn, right I'm going to be that way, YOU deserve it and have brought it upon yourself.
Enough said ? Shall we start with some information sharing.....from both sides of the arguement of course.... (yes this is me inviting you to bring your own sources into the DEBATE, so please, start doing your research so you can shut down this tinfoil hat wearing conspiricy theorist, I invite you to, by all accounts.
It would be great if we didn't get into the same old "im right your wrong" type of mentality, but I'm not holding my breathe. If that is truly how you want to proceed, which I doubt, but if you do, please word your replies differently so as not to deliberately piss me off.
Seriously, you think I talk to anyone and everyone this way, just because they may not agree with me ? Get the fuck outta here, and don't come back if you do, cos you know you are just trying to spin and insight shit. It's only because of our history I am like this with the select few of you on this forum.
Having said all that, peace and love to you anyways
