No, this analogy is faulty. "Science" doesn't cure diseases nor create atom bombs. "Science" is a method to investigate and invent things, whatever they may be. It is a guideline to explore the world around us and it's possibilities.
Whereas religion, by it's very definition, creates a set of boundaries that people must adhere to. It constricts, it does not liberate.
Whereas religion, by it's very definition, creates a set of boundaries that people must adhere to. It constricts, it does not liberate.
Nowadays it's a lot more 50/50 than in the days of yore, because nowadays organized religion doesn't dominate society anymore. It's no wonder that technological advancement in practice and rational thinking in society really took off around the period of Enlightenment, just to name a simple example.
That's where this thread went wrong. People going on the over-offensive, people getting butt-hurt and people arguing for the fuck of it. This went way too general way too fast.
It is, but the origin of this debate was religion and science. Not just "religion" but in specific Christianity. The ancient Greeks were never restricted on a scientific level by their religion. Neither were the Romans. Then they turned Christian. A bit later their empire went to shit.

That being said, I shall mount you like a wet poodle later. *licks lips*